road banne toh do

Ya right. Art. 👍

The way they are acting, ye log US jake waha ke comedian ko sunege to inki to G@*d hi fat jayegi. andrew schulz ko sunke to inke har opening mein se khoon ane lagega.

Fraud and tax evasion are crimes against the government, and therefore sources of pride, not condemnation.

This African is the right color.

Age doesn't matter when you cover it with sufficient bronzer and declare yourself a stable genius.

The matrimony stuff is basically a meat market. It is the single most dehumanizing experience, and it will shatter your sense of self worth completely if you don’t set some boundaries right away.

Yes it has. It was ICONIC FILM. The one who hate this films are just waanabe's.

Great great movie but mass following, no.

He started as a Victim, then became a Villain now he is the Hero.

He is not your father in law until you marry his daughter.

Tell him that you are genuinely interested in marrying his daughter and building a life together. Emphasize that you and his daughter have been committed to each other for eight years and know each other deeply. Throwing away such a strong, well-established relationship to marry a stranger wouldn’t make sense.

I assume you are financially independent and capable of providing for a stable life. If not, his concerns are understandable. You may be able to buy more time to reach that stage, but ultimately, it depends on her family’s expectations. Wishing you the best.

One of my all time favorites, I hope it gets re-released.

Yes I agree... It was all because if Samay and Sagar streams that I got into chess and I wasn't the only one. Man those streams eere fire.

Long or short SPY tomorrow?

Damn

That is peak lawlessness as for the job buddy that is the job

Me to 2 banake left over window me rakh dete hoo.

Crows Love maggi

Everyone should read this:-

‘Reservation not at odds with merit’: Supreme Court

https://indianexpress.com/article/india/supreme-court-neet-admissions-reservation-7733042/

(Click link above to read full )

Excerpts:

The bench said that competitive exams do not reflect the economic social advantage accrued to some classes over a period of time and that merit should be socially contextualised.

The bench referred to what it called “privileges” available to the forward classes and said these “are not limited to having access to quality schooling and access to tutorials and coaching centres to prepare for a competitive examination but also includes their social networks and cultural capital (communication skills, accent, books or academic accomplishments) that they inherit from their family”.

“The cultural capital ensures that a child is trained unconsciously by the familial environment to take up higher education or high posts commensurate with their family’s standing. This works to the disadvantage of individuals who are first-generation learners and come from communities whose traditional occupations do not result in the transmission of necessary skills required to perform well in open examination. They have to put in surplus effort to compete with their peers from the forward communities. On the other hand, social networks (based on community linkages) become useful when individuals seek guidance and advice on how to prepare for examination and advance in their career even if their immediate family does not have the necessary exposure. Thus, a combination of family habitus, community linkages and inherited skills work to the advantage of individuals belonging to certain classes, which is then classified as ‘merit’ reproducing and reaffirming social hierarchies,” it said.

The court clarified that “this is not to say that performance in competitive examination or admission in higher educational institutions does not require a great degree of hard work and dedication but it is necessary to understand that ‘merit’ is not solely of one’s own making”.

“The rhetoric surrounding merit obscures the way in which family, schooling, fortune and a gift of talents that the society currently values aids in one’s advancement. Thus, the exclusionary standard of merit serves to denigrate the dignity of those who face barriers in their advancement which are not of their own making. But the idea of merit based on scores in an exam requires a deeper scrutiny,” the bench said.

“While examinations are a necessary and convenient method of distributing educational opportunities, marks may not always be the best gauge of individual merit. Even then marks are often used as a proxy for merit. Individual calibre transcends performance in an examination,” it said.

“At the best, an examination can only reflect the current competence of an individual but not the gamut of their potential, capabilities or excellence, which are also shaped by lived experiences, subsequent training and individual character. The meaning of merit itself cannot be reduced to marks even if it is a convenient way of distributing educational resources.”

“The propriety of actions and dedication to public service should also be seen as markers of merit, which cannot be assessed in a competitive examination. Equally, fortitude and resilience required to uplift oneself from conditions of deprivation is reflective of individual calibre,” it said.

Pointing out that reservation ensures “opportunities are distributed in such a way that backward classes are equally able to benefit from such opportunities which typically evade them because of structural barriers”, it said “this is the only manner in which merit can be a democratising force that equalises inherited disadvantages and privileges. Otherwise, claims of individual merit are nothing but tools of obscuring inheritances that underlie achievements”.

“How we assess merit should also encapsulate if it mitigates or entrenches inequalities,” it said.

🫶

Gagan’s review was interesting- the man isn’t even hiding now that he is on the payroll of Hyundai.

Next stop Gotham City

Doors will open on the left

r/Fitness_India