Yes ...the answer is ALADEEN.

(positive or negative)

Public can decide !!!!!!!!!

This just reflects poverty and lack of exposure to moral education. Those who hustle for survival will never think of becoming civil.

OC

It's not region specific. Bengal, northeast, Mumbai girls are also slutshamed mercilessly.

If he could pass his agenda through Congress and make it law, he would do that without need for the executive orders, most of which will be shot down by the judiciary. I don't think they have confidence in the slim majority in the house.

Roast comedy show kaha se hoga dost..sabki fati padi hai.

>The words of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas have found their way into one of multiple lawsuits targeting the Elon Musk-helmed Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).

>Those words will likely prove familiar.

>In a 64-page lawsuit filed by 14 states on Thursday in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, the plaintiffs attacked the basic constitutional legitimacy of the cost-cutting organization with an iteration of the exact same argument that spelled doom for onetime special counsel Jack Smith in the Mar-a-Lago documents case.

What is this a crossover episode?

>As readers will recall, last summer, Chief Justice John Roberts and a majority of the justices issued a broad grant of presidential immunity; then, two weeks later, U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon used a concurrence to that opinion by Thomas to squelch Smith’s authority and dismiss the case against Trump with a novel reading of the U.S. Constitution’s Appointments Clause.

>Now, led by New Mexico, the latest anti-DOGE complaint uses an Appointments Clause argument of its own.

>“There is no greater threat to democracy than the accumulation of state power in the hands of a single, unelected individual,” the lawsuit begins. “President Trump has delegated virtually unchecked authority to Mr. Musk without proper legal authorization from Congress and without meaningful supervision of his activities. As a result, he has transformed a minor position that was formerly responsible for managing government websites into a designated agent of chaos without limitation and in violation of the separation of powers.”

DOGE used to be "United States Digital Service", it was renamed cause Elon can only rebrand things with names he thinks sound cool, TBH "United States Digital Service" sounds a bit cooler now that we see it in comparison to "Department of Government Efficiency". "United States Digital Service" sounds cyberpunk, like it fits in with the Ghost in the Shell anime.

>The lawsuit, which names Musk, DOGE, and Trump as defendants, argues the executive branch lacks the authority to either unilaterally create or “dismantle” a federal agency.

>“Framers of the Constitution crafted the Appointments Clause to protect against such tyranny in our system of government,” the lawsuit reads. “The Appointments Clause was designed to buttress the separation of powers in two ways: first by requiring that Congress create an office before the President can fill it, and second by requiring that the Senate confirm a nominee to an office created by law.”

The United States Digital Service was created by Obama in 2014, which means Musk is sitting in a position made by Obama? Someone tell Trump, he'll cut that funding like there's no tomorrow, and no more Musk.

>To hear the plaintiffs tell it, Musk’s “significant and unprecedented” perch within the Trump administration has effectively rendered him an unappointed “principal officer” of the United States.

>“Mr. Musk takes actions that can only be taken by a nominated and confirmed principal officer of the United States,” the lawsuit goes on. “But President Trump did not appoint Mr. Musk with the advice and consent of the Senate. Mr. Musk does not occupy an office created by law and has no authority to exercise the powers of a principal officer, or any other officer. Mr. Musk’s actions violate Article II, Section 2 of the United States Constitution.”

>This framework is precisely how Cannon viewed Smith. And, like Cannon, the plaintiffs have cited Thomas to make their case.

Clarence Thomas coming in with a steel chair to catch Musk in the back of the head. You can replate Clarence Thomas with Obama, Jack Smith, even Aileen Cannon if that makes it funny. Dark Brandon with the metal steps!

>From the lawsuit, at length:

>>Importantly, the Appointments Clause only grants the President the power to nominate officers to offices that Congress has already “established by Law.” U.S. Const. art. II, § 2, cl. 2. “If Congress has not reached a consensus that a particular office should exist, the Executive lacks the power to unilaterally create and then fill that office.” Trump v. United States, 603 U.S. 593, 650 (2024) (Thomas, J., concurring). “By keeping the ability to create offices out of the President’s hands, the Founders ensured that no President could unilaterally create an army of officer positions to then fill with his supporters. Instead, our Constitution leaves it in the hands of the people’s elected representatives to determine whether new executive offices should exist.” Id. at 646 (Thomas, J., concurring).

\*AIR HORNS\*

>The lawsuit, in a secondary argument, also says Musk and DOGE are acting beyond any statutory authority.

>The plaintiffs are asking the court for a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction that directs Musk to disclose how any government data obtained by DOGE has been used so far, that orders Musk to destroy any copies of such data in his possession, and that broadly bars him and DOGE from acting on any such data. The lawsuit contains a laundry list of 10 would-be prohibited actions.

Congress didn't say Musk could do shit, get the hell out of here.

>New Mexico and the other states, in often bombastic terms, are also asking the judge to echo some of their legal conclusions and rhetoric by issuing declaratory relief that “Musk’s officer-level governmental actions to date, including those of his subordinates and designees, are ultra vires and shall have no legal effect” and “declare that any future orders or directions by Mr. Musk or DOGE” are similarly unlawful.

>No judge has been assigned to the case of this writing.

They stopped short of demanding his deportation, but you know, one step at a time.

Also Telanagana is not what it was in 2014. I know she will not know this, because she knows only one thing that is to suck blood of middle class. And to take from south states and spend it for freebies in BJP ruled states.

Seems like you’ve got a good start! Since you already have her Instagram, you can keep the conversation going. Maybe reply to one of her stories casually or follow up on the trading topic—send her a useful video or article. Keep it light and natural; see how she responds. If she seems interested in talking, gradually shift to other topics and get to know her better. Don’t overthink the "Ameer-Moti Party" comment—what matters is how you both vibe. Just take it slow and see where it goes!

That picture you post, where is this from?

Nah boys approach me on other days today no one did.

That's a satire news page


Arunachal Pradesh ancestors used to rule north india in between 100 to 900 C.E
Source : folk tales of Arunachal Pradesh

Padhai kar rahi hu 🏃🏻‍♀️

Lag gaya 10000 ka chuna

Bhaiya catfish eppudu avvale?

beautiful 💘

Cfbr

Cursed hai bhai ye jgh. Jane me Dar lagta h yaha ab