Peter Thiel, the billionaire supporter of Donald Trump, had much to say in an op-ed Friday in the *Financial Times*, resulting in some critical feedback. 

In “A Time for Truth and Reconciliation”—a reference to post-Apartheid policies in South Africa—Thiel anticipates the Trump administration being fully equipped to, once and for all, expose the “deep state.” He mentions Jeffrey Epstein, the JFK assassination, and COVID-19.

“Trump’s return to the White House augurs the apokálypsis of the ancien regime’s secrets,” Thiel writes. “The new administration’s revelations need not justify vengeance—reconstruction can go hand in hand with reconciliation. But for reconciliation to take place, there must first be truth."

Thiel’s column drew a range of criticism, including from a columnist at the *Financial Times*, Edward Luce.

“Inside the mind of a Silicon Valley fanatic,” Luce reacted on BlueSky. “Peter Thiel makes Orwellian analogy between today’s liberal democracy and South African apartheid—and calls for a truth and reconciliation commission to uncover the crimes of America’s ‘Ancien regime.’ Beyond nuts.”

Andy Craig, a scholar at the Cato Institute, had a similar response.

“It reflects very poorly on FT to have published this crazy person rant,” he wrote on the same site. “Obviously he would have got it out there somewhere anyway, but there was no good reason to let it appear under their masthead. If it was by Peter Smith this would have gone straight into their crank submissions file.”

And Brookings Institute fellow Quinta Jurecic added that Thiel, “if he ever had it, has certainly lost it now.”

Stupid people comes in all languages.

Why do internet bullies have the most profound user name or insta bio.

Brother meri bhi halat same hai magar we have only two options to either sit back or to fight back aur mei ladai lad raha hu khud se taki apne under ke is dushman ko hara du

Wish the same for you

Ladai ladni hogi khud se kyunki tu apni ma ka sahara hai

Jisne tujhe janam dene ke liye itna dard saha uske liye tujhe bhi kuch dard sehne honge

Zalak is cute and so young to play a mother. Plus that ML shivam is super sauceless and has no screen presence.

this post /s

Check news, UFO spotted in Kerala /s

Can I accept rides, then cancel after making customers wait for 15 mins. But if they cancel, I need to assault customers.

ummm no , but chased yes , getting lost , loosing someone ...mostly running and hiding
apparently im very good at it in my dreams , like i can continue my dreams after few days or visit the same place again ...i have no control over it tho .

sometimes i know im dreaming and use it to manipulate everything in my favour in my dreams lol ...super weird

“Immigrants, trans sexuals and Mexicans have higher body temps than normal people”-MAGA next week on Fox News.

Lottie choco pie / munch / perk / kitkat >>>>>>>>> kinderjoy

That was not performance lol
Wkv se har koi chizo ko alg tarah se dekhta hai
Ye to sbse asani se manipulate hone wala vivian hai
Waise wo kvm ki kyo fat gyi clip se question is this😭

I think you are on the wrong track for a few reasons:

First, a technical co-founder isn't someone who works for you and does what you say. a co-founder is a trusted partner who works alongside you to run the company. They'll partner with you to figure out what to build, and they'll drive how to build it. They might decide to build in C++, but they might decide to use a different language, a different framework, a no-code tool, or any one of dozens of possible outcomes. You should partner with someone you trust to make those decisions, otherwise, why do you need them, and why would they join?

Second, as others have noted, the fact you are focused on \*how\* to build the product versus \*what\* to build means you are focused on something that probably has a 1% chance of determining your fate vs. something that has a 99% of driving your success, which is what to build, for whom, and to solve what problems.

Third, like most new founders, you talk about your idea like it's already fully-formed, already decided, and your challenge is to get it built. This almost always fails. You instead need a partner to \*discover\* the idea. You can use your current idea as a starting point, but as you interview customers and get prototypes in front of them, expect the idea to pivot and morph. You have to stay open to the possibility that: 1-the \*right\* idea might be far away from where you started, 2-your co-founder might contribute more to that idea than you do, which erodes whatever identity you've built up as "the idea guy."

Look for a true partner who you can pair up with to go out and get these questions answered, not someone who will comply with decisions you've already made that are unlikely to be the right ones anyway.

Most corrupted

Go to her house with some gifts (flowers/cake/chocolates) blah blah and just talk to her parents, ask them for their permission, then propose.

Physics wallah ke poster se achha hai

Ohh they need to bring back well-written characters from supernatural genre tv shows like Vikraal, and Hatim.

Mi hay koli.. Sorilya hodi naa mumbai cha kinaari 🎶

Do you know the muffin man?

Mera 29 ko he par shitt time nhi likha hua baad me ayega kya?