Auto driver cant even recogonize him.

In the comments some people were pointing out that he was wrong but the majority of them were laughing and encouraging him.

There are a-lot of jobs which are outdated or can be automated. Govt should provide voluntary retirements and stop this leakage of huge chunk of money. But these union bitches and political affiliation wont let any such things happen. Work less, bribe more, get paid more.

gg era me ye sab bat batayi nhi jaati najar lag jati hai

https://xdaforums.com/t/how-to-unlock-bootloader-on-xiaomi-hyperos-all-devices.4654009/
Try

Why isn't the demiurge an option.

Maximum 1 slice, I don't like Pizza at all 😅.

You're supposed to park beyond a solid white line. Not a dotted white line. Dotted white line means a lane. You are essentially blocking a lane by parking there.
I don't see a need for no parking sign here.

I want him to get arrest

Bahar Jao aur ek Rs.20 ka Milky Bar khao accha lagega.

Sounds great

A Lil dose of Procrastination

Not mutual funds?

Can the Waqf Board claim just any property?

The Waqf Board does not have the power to claim private properties or assets that are not originally designated as waqf properties. If a property has no historical or legal connection to a waqf, it cannot be claimed by the board.

According to Section 40, Sub-Section 3, of the Waqf Act 1995, if the board suspects any property registered under the Indian Trusts Act, 1882, or the Societies Registration Act, 1860 (21 of 1860), or any other act, to be waqf property, it can conduct an inquiry. If the inquiry confirms it as waqf property, the board can request the trust or society to register it under the Waqf Act or show cause why such property should not be registered as Waqf.

Section 40, Sub-Section 3, of the Waqf Act 1995. (Source: Screenshot/Union Ministry of Minority Affairs)

The law clearly states that to establish a waqf, the property owner must permanently declare the property for purposes recognized by Islamic law as pious, religious, or charitable. The Waqf Board has the authority to assert ownership over only those properties that have been dedicated as waqf by the property owner. The board will initiate a survey under Section 4 of the Waqf Act, 1995, to determine whether a property falls under their regulation. If the board possesses any document or legal evidence that a property has been declared as waqf in the past, they will issue a notice to the current owner. The owner will then be required to appear before the Waqf Tribunal, which functions as a civil court for Waqf-related disputes. The Tribunal is constituted according to the Act and comprises government officials. The Tribunal will conduct the proceedings, and based on the outcome, the board can either take possession of the land, modify the claim, or revoke it.


Section 40, Sub-Section 2 and 4, of the Waqf Act 1995. (Source: Union Ministry of Minority Affairs)

The board can also be sued otherwise in a civil court. According to Section 13, Sub-Section 3, of the Waqf Act 1995, “The Board shall be a body corporate having perpetual succession and a common seal with power to acquire and hold property and to transfer any such property subject to such conditions and restrictions as may be prescribed and shall by the said name sue and be sued.”

The act does not mention that the Waqf Board can claim any private or public properties, only that it can claim and administer 'waqf properties.’ The board cannot take possession of any property that is unrelated to waqf or lacks legal evidence of being a waqf property.

The Waqf Act of 1995 was amended in 2013. The gazette containing all the amendments was published on the Ministry of Minority Affairs website. The new amendments introduced several changes, but they did not include any provision granting the authority to the Waqf Board to claim any land. Additionally, no modifications were made to Section 40.23Waqf Act, 1954

What do experts say?

Kabeer E S M, an advocate at the Kerala High Court, told Logically Facts, "Once a property is dedicated as waqf, it will always remain Waqf and cannot be taken back. The Board has the power to administer and manage only these waqf properties.” He added that the Waqf Board has no power to claim any private land or property that has no relation to waqf and that if such a claim is made, the board can be sued.

Abdul Azeez T.H., an advocate at the Kerala High Court specializing in Waqf-related cases explained the process of claiming a property and said that if the board gathers evidence during an inquiry that a property belongs to them, a notice will be sent to the owner. In case the property was indeed dedicated as waqf and the board has legal documents, the Tribunal will grant authority over the property to the board, as waqf represents a 'permanent dedication' of property. “However, if the property is not a waqf, the Tribunal will revoke the claim. If the owner has legal evidence and can prove that the property is not related to waqf, and the board still claims the property, then a lawsuit can be filed against them in a civil court,” he said.

Upamanyu Hazarika, a senior advocate at the Supreme Court, made the same point. "The Waqf Board is a government body, similar to several other government entities. It operates within its own jurisdiction and cannot exceed those limits. The Waqf Tribunal addresses disputes concerning waqf properties, but the board can also be subject to legal action elsewhere,” he said.

According to a report by Live Law from May 24, a bench of the Supreme Court noted that it is essential to conduct a survey under Section 4 of the Waqf Act, 1954, before declaring a property as "waqf property".
The verdict

The claims circulating on social media suggesting that the Waqf Board has the authority to claim and take over any private or public land, including Hindu temples, are false. The Waqf Act 1995, which governs the administration of Waqf properties, does not grant such powers to the Waqf Board. The act strictly pertains to Waqf properties, which have been dedicated to religious, charitable, or community purposes according to Islamic law. Therefore, we have marked this claim as false.

https://www.logicallyfacts.com/en/fact-check/false-no-waqf-boards-cannot-claim-and-acquire-just-any-private-or-public-property

I don't react to most of today's happenings but this one got me. Please stay safe Rahulji.

To be honest, KL as a keeper and No.5 batter was wonderful during the CWC23, except for the finals. He fumbled a few while keeping and his batting, I rather not say much.

India was fkd really by the absence of someone like Hardik who could counter attack.

As much as I don't agree with Pant's inclusion in the shorter formats, he is very much like Travis Head, who made the difference for the Aussies that day.

When it comes off, it pays. Some one who can play that kind of cricket was missing in our middle order that day. Rohit was the only one and Kohli was dismissed before he could.

Surya was supposed to be that player but we know how that panned out.

Kuldeep as a batter can defend, but can't hit those 10 ball 20s.

Our weak lower order has always been a pain.

We really missed Hardik that day. Sometimes, we need someone who says "fk it" and play his shots.

Atul watching this from heaven 🥲R.I.P

Hey hi
You can consult Dr Rishikesh Behere in Baner..I’ve been consulting him from last 3-4 years.
He’s a great guy and might help you!

I don't think you should drop off, you can learn the hard part of trading (lose money + jump from one strategy to another one) while you're earning a degree.

You never know when you can need that degree...

Man that rear is sexy.

Just for the record, I'd take this over a Speed 400, 8 days a week.

Edit: top tier shitpost by OP. I bow down to thee.

https://preview.redd.it/nl817kck3hhe1.jpeg?width=1079&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1650b26570b6c96495adb73298c5b52eb2c7c3f1