Is the Dhriti hate in Family man honestly justified?

I made a similar comment on another post, so decided to make a separate post for it. She knew nothing that we did. For her all she saw her parents constantly fighting so she didn't want to talk to any of them. Then she saw her father leave for Kashmir, and the way he talked and behaved around she reached a conclusion with her limited info that he was leaving because he didn't want to stay with her or her brother. Then when he finally got the corporate job, he and suchi got into some huge fight, which added to his longing to return to his old job made him join it back and he left again. But from her perspective, he left again because he fought with her mother. For her all she knew that they fought about his job. For her it was a simple desk job, so its natural that she would feel her father would rather return home at any time, leave at any time for some meagre corporate job than spend time with her. She never knew what was at stake here. Yes she was arrogant, gave backhanded replies and ignored her parents, but which moody teenager doesn't? So many teenagers have a secret boyfriend/girlfriend, that's normal for their age. That doesn't make her terrible. As a matter of fact we some improvement in her character when at the end she doesn't start blaming her father for her attack (which would kind of be justified on her end), but she is sorry and she thanks her father for saving her. I think with the Suchi hate (which is justified), we also piggyback that hate on Dhriti as well, but never Atharv. Atharv and Dhriti both are exactly how most kids their age are. They were not terrible people, just confused and trying to make sense of what was happening.